Court rules against Toyota Kenya in Sh383 million Case

by Lawyer Wanz
Spread the love

Toyota Kenya has lost a Sh383 million claim against the government for alleged breach of contract and delay in payment of some 500 vehicles purchased between February 2014 and 2017.

Justice David Majanja agreed with the government, which had been sued under Vehicle & Equipment Leasing Ltd, saying there is no evidence the government accepted the terms imposed by the car maker.

Toyota was demanding the Sh383 million arising from interest for late payments for the vehicles acquired by the government after the end of the lease period.

The Japanese auto firm says the State was obligated to pay for the 500 vehicles within 30 days after invoices were issued and the failure to pay on time attracted 3 percent interest.

But State dismissed the existence of the penalty for late payment, prompting the court suit.

“In the circumstances, I hold that the Plaintiff (Toyota Kenya) is not entitled to claim nor has it established the claim for interest on late payments from the Defendant,” the judge said.

In 2014, Toyota inked a deal with the State for lease of cars, mainly for use by police, as the government sought to cut the expenses of buying vehicles.

The deal saw Toyota sell a total of 1,200 vehicles, which were initially leased to the government under the National Police Service Lease Scheme.

The government and the car dealer later fell out over delayed payments. Toyota claims that an agreement signed attracted an interest of 3 percent for delayed payments. The company then moved to court accusing the government of breach of contract for failing to pay the interest.

The judge said by presenting an invoice with fresh terms as to time of payment and interest on late payment, Toyota was in effect making a fresh offer.

He said in order for the offer to be effective, there had to be a meeting of minds which is an essential component for the formation of an enforceable contract.

“In this case, I find that the Plaintiff, by issuing an invoice containing different and additional terms as to interest, unilaterally introduced terms which constituted a variation on the terms of the agreement.

In the deal signed by President Uhuru Kenyatta soon after Jubilee took over power and in a bid to equip the police movement, the government would issue local purchase order for a number of vehicles, which were to be paid on delivery.

Alice Munene, a retired employee with Toyota explained that upon delivery of the vehicles, a delivery note was signed by the government acknowledging receipt.

Via Business Daily


Mahakamani News is Kenya’s top court reporting and crime coverage website. If you have a case that needs coverage, or if you are facing injustice from powerful forces, fired unfairly or reporting any corruption or relevant news pertaining judiciary etc please contact us via cases@mahakamani.news

Comments

comments

You may also like